Reducing emissions of pollutant gases during slurry storage

Rosa Gallart
21-Sep-2023 (2 years 8 months 15 days ago)

In Spain, aligning farms with the new regulatory framework (Royal Decree 306/2020) involves adapting new slurry management techniques, including making modifications to management and even revising the structural conditions for new barns and external storage systems. Applying the best available techniques (BATs, the techniques tested on a commercial farm scale that have proven to be technically and economically feasible and at the same time provide environmental protection) to optimize slurry management inside the barns for existing farms means increasing the frequency of emptying the pits to the outside storage, which must be done at least once a month. Increasing the frequency of emptying to the lagoons implies adapting the storage autonomy beyond three months, in order to adapt the slurry management to the ideal times for its application as a fertilizer in the agricultural setting.

For existing farms at the date of publication of RD 306/2020, there are two different scenarios: they may only need to adapt the storage systems with emission reduction techniques; or they may have to build new systems to increase their storage autonomy, which should be built in such a way as to generate the minimum ammonia emissions compared to the emissions produced during storage in a lagoon without a cover and without natural crust formation, a technique that has been considered the reference for the calculation of the reduction efficiencies. For new farms, the design and construction of the facilities, both those that will house the animals and those that will store the slurry, should consider techniques that allow high emission reduction efficiencies.

The following table lists the techniques defined as BAT for storage lagoons or tanks and their applicability depending on whether they are intended for the adaptation of existing systems or for new constructions.

BAT Environmental effectiveness - Reduction of ammonia emissions in storage (%) vs. reference technique Applicable in existing lagoons/tanks Applicable in new lagoons/tanks
Covering with floating materials (natural crust, straw, peat, bark, etc.) 40% X
Acidification (pH=6) 50% X
Replacement of lagoons with elevated tanks (>3 m high). 30-60%* X

Cover with expanded clay balls (Lightweight expanded clay aggregate/LECA) or Pearlite and Zeolite.

60% X
Covers with geometric pieces (hexagons, balls, etc.) 60% X
Floating plastic covers 60% X
Flexible covers 80% X X
Rigid covers (concrete, fiberglass panels, etc.) 80% X X
Slurry bags 100% X X

*Framework Code for Good Agricultural Practice for Reducing Ammonia Emissions, UNECE 2015.

<p>Figure 1. 40-60% reduction efficiency of NH3 emissions with floating materials: in the photo on the left, compact natural crust with filling and emptying under crust and in the photo on the right, LECA. (Image provided by Arvet).</p>

<p>Figure 2. NH3 emission reduction efficiency of 60% with floating geometric pieces: in the photo on the left, HEXA-COVER hexagons (image provided by DPLAN) and PANAL FLOTANTE water-filled balls in the photo on the right.</p>

<p>Figure 3. 80% reduction efficiency of NH3 emissions with flexible tent-type covers (left) or flexible covers with polypropylene film or the like (right).</p>

With large lagoons, this technique may not be economically viable, so in order to achieve 80% reductions, we will have to evaluate whether the simultaneous application of two or more techniques with lower efficiency in reducing emissions can be equally effective. In spite of the different tank cover systems, farms that have to implement new external storage devices must take into account that the application of BAT requires a rethinking of the design. The new construction requirements are based on: