Effects of feed processing and diet composition on the nutritional value

Ester Vinyeta
17-Mar-2017 (9 years 2 months 19 days ago)

In swine production, feed costs have large impact on total production costs. Maximizing nutrient utilization of the diet is part of the strategy to reduce the impact of high costs of raw materials

The hydrothermal treatment (conditioning with steam followed by compaction -pelleting- with or without expansion or extrusion) of pig diets results in the majority of cases in an improvement of the productive efficiency in both piglets and in the following stages of fattening. Rojas and Stein (2016) propose an improvement of the conversion rate that ranges from 4-12% as a result of the pelleting process of the diets compared to diets feed as meal. Table 1 lists some studies that illustrate these improvements.

Table 1. Effects of pelleting on the improvement of feed conversion ratio in piglets and fattening pigs

    Feed Conversion Ratio
Reference   meal pellet dif. %
Wondra et al., 1995 fattening pigs 3.37 3.14 6.6%
Millet et al., 2012 fattening pigs 2.58 2.45 5.0%
Xing et al, 2004 piglets 1.303 1.212 7.0%
Lundblat et al., 2011 piglets 1.32 1.23 6.8%
Ulens et al., 2015 piglets 1.54 1.29 16.1%

The hydrothermal treatment of pig diets results in an improvement of the digestibility of energy and nutrients. Other positive effects are increased intake, especially in piglets, and a reduction in feed losses in hoppers and pits.

For most pigs the coefficient of digestibility of energy varies between 70-90%. Much of this variation is due to the presence of fiber in the diet: the more fiber the less digestibility of energy. Other factors of variation are the technological processing of the diets and the live weight or stage of development of the animal.

The pelleting process is considered to increase energy digestibility of the diet by an average of 1% although the improvement may be more important depending on the chemical and physical (particle size) properties of the diets. Noblet and Van Milgen (2004) showed that the improvement in digestibility when pelleting the diet was mainly due to an increase in fat digestibility (in diets with corn or full-fat rapeseed) and consequently the energy value of these ingredients depends on the technological treatment (Table 2).

Table 2. Effect of pelletting and particle size on digestibility coefficient (%) of fat and energy in growing pigs (from Noblet & van Milgen 2004).

Item Meal Pellet Abs. improvement
Corn-soybean diets
Fat 61 77 16
Energy 88.4 90.3 1.9
Wheat-soybean meal-full fat rapeseed diets (coarse grinding)
Fat 27 84 57
Energy 73.1 87.4 14.3
Wheat-soybean meal-full fat rapeseed diets (fine grinding)
Fat 81 86 5
Energy 85.5 87.6 2.1

More intense processes such as expansion or extrusion with or without subsequent pelleting may have additional effects on productive efficiency. Lundblad et al (2012) found that a hydrothermal treatment improved the ileal digestibility of starch in pigs (29.5kg live weight) compared to meal diets and also increased ileal digestibility of some amino acids such as lysine, arginine, isoleucine and threonine. In the case of lysine, the improvement was superior in expanded and extruded diets than in only granulated diets.

The negative effects of high indigestible fiber content in the diets can be reduced with a pelleting treatment and accentuate this improvement with extrusion, resulting in a greater solubilization of dietary fiber and fermentation thereof.

Recently, the results of a study by Rojas et al (2016) comparing the effects of different hydrothermal processing intensities (meal, pelleting, extrusion and extrusion + pelleting) on three types of diets with low, medium and high levels of dietary fiber in growing pigs allow to conclude that:

Effects of fiber contents and technological treatment of the diets on the metabolizable energy value

 

Conclusions

 

Considerations for hydrothermal treatment