Tagging piglets, whether it is a single batch from time to time or all batches with different colours, is a great way to detect flaws in your internal biosecurity. We tagged one batch of 1050 pigs born during one week in farrow-to-finish farm. The pigs were weaned at 4 weeks of age and tracked through 1st stage weaning (5wks), 2nd stage (4wks), and 3rd-finisher stage up to the abattoir.
The last pigs left in first stage were moved to second stage on week 13th of age, when all the tagged pigs were supposed to be in 3rd stage. Many tagged pigs were spread in several rooms of second stage that week (figure 1). The farmer was not conscious of this situation at all.

Figure 1. Map of the farm. The pens holding any tagged animal are shown in yellow.
The reasons why pigs were moved around included:
Three different flows were identified and are described in table 1:
Table 1. Comparison of the evolution of pigs in each flow (matched per birth weight).
| Normal flow | Retained 1 week | Retained several times | |
| Average birth weight, kg | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.21 |
| Birth weight variability, %CV | 23 | 23 | 24 |
| Average litter size | 13.4 | 13.7 | 13.3 |
| Average parity | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.0 |
| Average body weight at weaning, kg | 7.2 | 5.2 | 5.9 |
| Weaning weight variability, %CV | 17 | 21 | 27 |
| Average carcass weight , kg | 87.9 | 85.7 | 79.3 |
| Carcass weight variability, %CV | 10 | 11 | 14 |
Pigs retained several times were from litters with lower average parity, had a lower carcass weight and higher condemnations due to pericarditis and milk spots (figure 2) than pigs in the normal flow.

Figure 2. Heart and liver condemnations for the different flows of pigs.
Whether these differences are the causes or consequences of pigs not following the normal flow requires further study. However these movements of animals clearly violate biosecurity practices and spread disease within the farm. Simple rules to follow are: