Health protocols for replacements: gastrointestinal diseases (3/3)

Anna Romagosa
10-Oct-2016 (9 years 7 months 26 days ago)

The importance of acclimatizing replacements to the enteric pathogens present on the holding must not be forsaken when designing an acclimatization program for gilts. In this case, the goals of the acclimatization process include: exposing the future sows to the pathogenic microflora present on the farm and ensuring adequate concentration of specific antibodies at the time of farrowing in order to protect the offspring against enteric disorders during lactation.

As with any acclimatization process, the combination of natural exposure and vaccines would be the most advisable option. However, when it comes to enteric pathogens, the active immune response depends on the production of antibodies at mucosal level, and this is the reason why the most effective vaccines must be administered orally (e.g., the vaccine against Lawsonia intracellularis). There are not many immunoprophylaxis options available on the market, just the vaccine against E.ColiClostridiumLawsonia and autogenous vaccines.

Natural exposure or feedback has been widely used in gilt acclimatization. Although there is no exact science regarding the feedback implementation protocol, it's been proved to be effective, when applied correctly (sufficient exposure), in the control of certain enteric diseases for which vaccine immunity is not sufficient or does not exist (TGE, rotavirus, etc).

Three basic points must be considered in the feedback process:

Feedback implementation for replacements

  1. Certain bacteria are capable of producing toxins quickly, and some pathogens can be destroyed and lose their immunogenic properties over time. Use "fresh" material or freeze it.
     
  2. Administer feedback multiple times and consistently. Let the animals "cool down", i.e. suspend administration at the right time to avoid excretion upon entering the farrowing pen. The use of this technique is highly recommended during acclimatization and before farrowing.
     
  3. Analyse the material (samples can be frozen for subsequent analysis) to know what the animals are being administered. Using this system for immunization against Clostridium or rotavirus is no use if the pathogen or strain are not present. Exposure must be consistent in the replacement process (e.g., in the case of PED, the amount the animal is exposed to in one dose is more important than administering multiple doses with a small amount of virus in each dose).

For some pathogens such as E. coli or Clostridium, the subsequent additional use (feedback) of a bacterin, can work well as a booster.

It is very important to assess whether or not to use this technique. Do not use it in outbreaks of PRRS or in farms with swine dysentery.

 

Example of a feedback program during replacement procedures

Material to be collected

 

Suckling piglets with diarrhoea

Figure 1. Suckling piglets with diarrhoea

 

Preparation of material

Feedback ready for use

Figure 2. Water ready for use after a night of "rest".

 

Feedback administration

 

Feedback of replacements before farrowing

Material and preparation

Administration

Keep in mind that, for replacements, it is important not to administer feedback before 20-22 weeks of life and in the three weeks before service or farrowing.

The feedback technique before farrowing can be counterproductive in gilts that have not been exposed during the acclimatization phase, because they can vehicle these pathogens into the farrowing room. Exposure during acclimatization can be considered the first dose of a vaccine, and pre-farrowing exposure its booster.

Table 1. Feedback characteristics depending on the material used.

  Cost of equipment Time required Ease of use Effectiveness
Frozen material  + ++ ++ ++
Liquid diet dispenser ++ + +++ +++
Water dosers +++ + +++ +++
Spray + +++ + +